NCCI 2026Q3 tables · reviewed September 19, 2026

Can you bill 96360 and 96374 together?

96360: hydration, initial 31–60 minutes. 96374: therapeutic IV push, single or initial drug. · NCCI 2026q3 · Methodology

Billing 96360 and 96374 together: the short version

Not as two initial codes. On one encounter the initial service is the reason the patient was treated — here the drug — so the push is 96374 and the fluid is 96361, each additional hour of hydration, once it runs 31 minutes or more. Billing 96360 with 96374 is for a separate IV site or a separate encounter only, and column 2 of that edit is 96374, not the hydration.

The column-2 code in this edit is the push, so a claim carrying both 96360 and 96374 loses the 96374 — the higher-paying line — not the hydration.

Code this visit

Free claim calculator · Medicare basis

Ondansetron 8 mg IV push for a vomiting patient, then 75 minutes of normal saline for dehydration on a separate order in the office. The push is the initial service (96374); the hydration that followed is 96361, not 96360:

LineDescriptionUnitsModMedicare allowed
J2405Zofran (1 unit = 1 mg)8JZ$0.70
96374IV push, initial1$37.74
96361Hydration, each additional hour (with another initial service)1$13.03
Medicare-basis total$51.47

Any drug in the catalog, NDC lines, JW/JZ — free. A payer’s policy and your contracted rate come with the free 30-day trial.

What the NCCI table says about 96360 and 96374

The 96360 / 96374 pair as it stands in the CMS PTP tables for 2026q3 (as of 2026-07-01), identical on the practitioner and hospital-outpatient tables:

Practitioner table
Modifier indicator 1

96374 (column 2) denies as included in 96360 (column 1) unless the 96374 line carries a distinct-service modifier — XS for a separate access site, XE for a separate encounter, or 59 — and the record supports a distinct service.

Column 1 96360 · column 2 96374 · edit effective January 2009.

Hospital outpatient table
Modifier indicator 1

Same edit, same direction: column 1 96360, column 2 96374, since January 2009. A UB-04 carrying 96360 and 96374 is adjudicated exactly as the CMS-1500 is.

Why the answer is what it is

Urgent-care and infusion-suite claims produce this pair constantly: an antiemetic or analgesic pushed, then fluids. Both are billable. The trap is thinking the fluid, being the longer service, earns the initial code — it does not. In physician reporting the initial code belongs to the primary reason for the encounter (the drug that treated the vomiting), and in facility reporting CPT ranks hydration lowest; the push takes 96374 either way, and the hydration is reported as 96361 for its first hour as well as any later ones, provided the fluid ran 31 minutes or more after (or before) the push and was ordered for a clinical reason, not to keep the line open.

The NCCI edit for this pair is unusual in its direction: 96360 is column 1 and 96374 is column 2, modifier indicator 1, since January 2009. If a claim carries both initial codes, it is the push that denies as included in the hydration. That is exactly backwards from the coding intent, which is why the right answer is almost always to drop 96360 to 96361 rather than to reach for a modifier on 96374.

The one legitimate two-initial claim is a separate IV access — a second line started because the pushed drug could not go through the hydration line — or a second encounter on the same date. Then 96374 carries XS (second site) or XE (second encounter) with 96360 and the documentation names the site or the return visit. The 75 minutes in the example produce one unit of 96361 (31–90 minutes beyond the push); at 91 minutes it would be two.

When 96360 is its own service beside 96374

A second venous access site established for the push because it was incompatible with the running fluid, or a distinct encounter later the same date. That is the only ground for 96360 and 96374 on one claim; the modifier goes on 96374.

Units: the MUE on each code

CodeDescriptorPractitioner MUE / dayFacility MUE / dayAdjudication · rationale
96360hydration, initial 31–60 minutes12MAI 3 · Clinical: Data
96374therapeutic IV push, single or initial drug11MAI 3 · Code Descriptor / CPT Instruction

96360 and 96374 are MAI 3: units are summed across the date of service, and a documented medical-necessity appeal can pay units above the limit. Other codes: MUE lookup.

The rule that decides it

The 96360 / 96374 answer rests on H1 in the claim builder’s rule set (source: NCCI Policy Manual 2026 ch. XI §B.2), the rule it applies when it places the initial-service line:

H1 · NCCI Policy Manual 2026 ch. XI §B.2

…For a patient encounter, only one "initial" service code may be reported unless it is medically reasonable and necessary that the drug or substance administrations occur at separate intravenous access sites.… Full text of H1

Related hierarchy rules for this claim: H2 (CPT 2026 hydration / therapeutic infusion guidelines · NCCI Policy Manual 2026 ch. XI §B.6) and H3 (CPT 2026 hydration / therapeutic infusion guidelines).

What the record has to show

The denial this pair produces, and the fix

CO-97 on the 96374 line when it lands with 96360 — the push, not the fluid, is the column-2 code. Rebill with 96374 as the initial service and the hydration as 96361; reserve 96374-XS or 96374-XE with 96360 for a documented separate site or encounter.

What payers pay for 96360, 96374 and 96361

The median payer contract pays 135–148% of Medicare on 96360, 96374, 96361. On 96360 the highest payer median is Blue Shield of California’s $180.83 and the lowest BCBS Arizona’s $24.76, against Medicare’s $33.40; Blue Shield of California is highest on 3 of the 3 lines. Pick a state below for each payer’s own number where you bill.

CodeMedicare (PFS, office)Median payer contractMiddle half of payer mediansPayers
96360$33.40$49.27 (148%)$45.04–$58.8637
96374$37.74$52.75 (140%)$47.72–$62.1237
96361$13.03$17.59 (135%)$16.34–$20.5037

5,285 payer×state medians for 96360, 96374, 96361 from 37 payers’ Transparency-in-Coverage files (2026-Q2-06); Medicare = national non-facility PFS.

This claim priced by your payer — Zofran’s rate on the drug line, 96360 and 96374 and 96361 at the payer’s contracted amount, the payer’s policy on Zofran (prior auth, covered diagnoses), and the patient’s share — is the same claim in your free account.

Price this claim for your payer — start free →

Free 30-day trial, no card. The claim above opens in Claim Check with the drug, dose, setting and your payer already filled in.

Questions billers ask about 96360 and 96374

The fluids ran 45 minutes and the push happened in the middle of the bag. What is billable?

The push (96374) and nothing for the fluid. Hydration concurrent with a drug administration is not separately reportable, and stopping the bag for a two-minute push does not create a sequential service. If the fluid ran a further 31 minutes or more after the push finished, that portion is 96361.

Two pushes (ondansetron and ketorolac) plus fluids — is the second push 96374 again?

No. The first push is 96374 (one initial service per encounter, practitioner MUE 1); the second, a different drug, is 96375. The hydration is still 96361. Three administration lines, two drug J-codes, and the fluid itself on its own line (J7030 for a litre of normal saline).

Why is 96374 the column-2 code in the 96360 / 96374 edit when the push is the initial service?

The PTP table pairs codes for bundling, not for choosing the initial code: it says the two initial services should not both appear on one encounter, and it happens to list 96360 as column 1. CPT’s initial-code rule tells you which one survives — the push — and CPT’s instruction to report hydration with 96361 when another initial service is present is how you comply with both.

Sources