Reviewed August 21, 2026

CPT 96521 / 96522 / 96523 — pump refills and port flushes

The maintenance codes around an infusion, rather than the infusion itself. Two of them are straightforward. The third, the port flush, is bundled far more often than it is paid — and that single rule decides most of these claims.

Quick Answer

What do 96521, 96522, and 96523 report?

96521 is refilling and maintenance of a portable pump — the take-home device a patient carries out of the infusion suite, most often a 46-hour 5-FU pump.

96522 is refilling and maintenance of an implantable pump or reservoir for systemic drug delivery — a device under the skin, not one the patient carries.

96523 is irrigation — a flush — of an implanted venous access device. Medicare pays it only when it is the only service billed that day. Any visit, injection, or infusion on the same date absorbs it.

About CPT 96521, 96522 and 96523

CodeDescriptorThe device
96521 Refilling and maintenance of portable pump External and portable. The patient leaves with it. Elastomeric or electronic ambulatory pumps used for continuous infusion.
96522 Refilling and maintenance of implantable pump or reservoir for drug delivery, systemic Implanted. Surgically placed under the skin. Refilled by percutaneous access, not carried.
96523 Irrigation of implanted venous access device for drug delivery systems A port, not a pump. This is the flush that keeps an implanted venous access device patent.

None of the three is an add-on. Each stands on its own, which is exactly why the bundling rules below matter so much: nothing about the code structure stops you from putting one on a claim where it does not belong.

What do 96521, 96522, and 96523 reimburse?

CodeNon-facilityFacilityTotal RVU
96521 — portable pump refill$143.62$143.624.30
96522 — implantable pump or reservoir refill$125.25$125.253.75
96523 — implanted venous access device irrigation$26.05$26.050.78

CY2026 national rates; MAC-adjusted locally. Figures are RVU-derived against the CY2026 conversion factor of $33.4009 and are held in mpfs-admin-rates.json as the source of truth for this site. Facility and non-facility are identical, consistent with the rest of this administration family.

The spread is the thing to notice. A pump refill pays roughly five and a half times what a port flush pays, and the flush is the one that is usually bundled. Practices lose money in this family by billing the $26 code they cannot keep, and by missing the $143 code they could.

The bundling rules that decide most of these claims

96523 is payable only when it is the only service that day. If the patient also had an office visit, an injection, or any infusion on the same date, Medicare treats the flush as included in that service and pays nothing extra for it. A port flush on its own day is a billable encounter; a port flush attached to anything else is not.

The four rules, in the order they bite
  1. Was anything else billed that day? If yes, do not report 96523. National Correct Coding Initiative edits enforce this, so it fails at the clearinghouse rather than on appeal.
  2. Was the port accessed in order to give the infusion? Then the access and flush are inherent to the infusion itself and are not separately reportable — not as 96523, not as anything else. This is the single most common error in the family.
  3. Is 96416 on the claim? 96521 and 96522 are not reported with 96416 (initiation of prolonged chemotherapy infusion with a pump). The initiation code already contemplates setting the pump up.
  4. Where was the service performed? Professional charges for 96521–96523 are for the physician-office setting. They should not be submitted for services administered in a hospital or in the patient's home.

96521 or 96522 — portable or implanted?

The distinction is the device, not the drug and not the duration. Ask one question: did the patient leave with the pump on them?

96521 — portable

  • External device the patient carries or wears
  • Elastomeric ("baby bottle") and electronic ambulatory pumps
  • The 46-hour 5-FU pump in FOLFOX, FOLFIRINOX and FLOT
  • Refilled by exchanging or filling the cassette or reservoir

96522 — implanted

  • Device surgically placed beneath the skin
  • Implantable pump or reservoir for systemic delivery
  • Refilled by percutaneous access through the skin
  • Nothing leaves with the patient

The refill-versus-disconnect question

This one is genuinely contested, and it is worth stating honestly rather than picking a side and sounding certain.

The descriptor for 96521 reads refilling and maintenance of a portable pump. A patient returning on day three of a FOLFOX cycle to have the 46-hour pump taken off is not being refilled, and whether that visit is "maintenance" is where practices and payers disagree. AMA CPT Assistant has published specific guidance on reporting 96521 (June 2026) but it sits behind the AMA's paywall, so this page does not claim to settle it.

What is not in dispute: a refill visit is 96521. A visit where the pump is only disconnected and nothing else happens is commonly reported as a low-level established-patient visit instead, and a number of payers expect exactly that. If your practice bills 96521 for disconnect-only encounters, confirm it against your MAC's guidance and keep the documentation that supports it — this is a line item that gets looked at.

When to use, and when not to

Report these when…

  • A portable pump is genuinely refilled or maintained at the visit (96521)
  • An implanted pump or reservoir is refilled (96522)
  • A port is flushed and nothing else is billed that day (96523)
  • The service is performed in the physician-office setting
  • The encounter is documented on its own terms, not as part of an infusion

Do not report these when…

  • The port was accessed in order to give an infusion — that is inherent
  • Any other billable service is on the same date as the flush
  • 96416 is on the claim alongside 96521 or 96522
  • The service was rendered in a hospital or in the patient's home
  • You are reaching for 96523 to capture nursing time on an infusion day

Per-payer requirements

Medicare (all MACs). 96523 is payable only as the sole service of the day; otherwise it is included in the other service's payment. NCCI edits pair 96521 and 96522 against 96416. Professional charges in this family are for the office setting.

Commercial payers. Most mirror the Medicare bundling logic, but the sole-service rule for 96523 is applied with varying strictness, and some plans reimburse a disconnect-only encounter differently from Medicare. Where a payer's policy is silent, the safest reading is the Medicare one.

All payers. The documentation that carries these claims is device-specific: which device, what was done to it, and what else happened at the encounter. "Port flushed" on a day with an infusion is a denial waiting to be written.

Worked examples

FOLFOX day 1 — pump goes home with the patient 96413 + 96415 + 96411 + 96416
Encounter
Oxaliplatin infusion, leucovorin, 5-FU bolus push, then the 46-hour pump is started
Pump
Portable elastomeric, patient leaves wearing it
Question
Does 96521 belong on this claim?
No. Nothing was refilled — the pump was started. Initiation of the prolonged infusion is 96416, and 96521 is not reported alongside it. 96521 becomes relevant only if the patient returns for the cassette to be refilled.
Port flush on its own day 96523 × 1
Encounter
Patient comes in between cycles for a maintenance flush of an implanted port
Other services
None. No visit billed, no injection, no infusion
Setting
Physician office
Line 1: 96523 × 1 — irrigation of implanted venous access device
This is the one case where 96523 pays. Sole service, office setting, documented as its own encounter. Add anything else to the day — even a low-level visit — and the flush stops being separately payable.
Port flushed before an infusion infusion code only
Encounter
Port accessed and flushed, then a therapeutic infusion is given through it
Temptation
Bill 96523 for the flush plus 96365 for the infusion
Line 1: 96365 × 1 — initial therapeutic infusion
(no 96523 — access and flush are inherent to the infusion)
The flush disappears into the infusion. Accessing and flushing the device to deliver the drug is part of delivering the drug. Reporting it separately is both a same-day violation and an unbundling one, and it is the most common way this code is billed wrongly.

Common denials and how to fix them

What comes backWhyThe fix
Flush bundled into another service 96523 reported on a date that also carried a visit, injection or infusion Remove the 96523 line. It is not appealable — the rule is that the flush is included, not that it was under-documented.
Unbundling / NCCI edit against 96416 96521 or 96522 submitted alongside prolonged-infusion initiation Drop the refill line for that encounter. Report 96521 at the visit where the pump is actually refilled.
Place-of-service denial Professional charge submitted for a service rendered in a hospital or the patient's home These codes carry a professional charge in the office setting. Re-route the billing to the correct party for the setting.
Wrong device code 96522 billed for a take-home pump, or 96521 for an implanted reservoir Rebill against the device. Portable and worn out of the suite is 96521; implanted under the skin is 96522.
Refill code on a disconnect-only visit 96521 reported for an encounter where the pump was removed and nothing refilled Check your payer's position before appealing. Many expect a low-level established-patient visit for a disconnect-only encounter.

Frequently asked questions

When is 96523 actually payable?

Only when it is the sole service billed for that date. Medicare includes the flush in payment for any visit, injection, or infusion performed the same day. A standalone maintenance flush between cycles, documented as its own encounter in the office setting, is the case that pays.

Can I bill 96523 for accessing the port before an infusion?

No. Accessing and flushing an implanted device in order to deliver an infusion is inherent to that infusion and is not separately reportable. It is both a same-day bundling problem and an unbundling problem, and it is the most frequent misuse of the code.

What is the difference between 96521 and 96522?

The device, not the drug. 96521 is a portable pump — external, carried or worn by the patient, such as the 46-hour 5-FU pump. 96522 is an implantable pump or reservoir placed under the skin and refilled by percutaneous access. If the patient walked out wearing it, it is 96521.

Can I report 96521 with 96416 on the same claim?

No. 96521 and 96522 are not reported with 96416, the initiation of a prolonged chemotherapy infusion using a pump. Initiation already contemplates setting the pump up; the refill code applies at a later encounter when the pump is genuinely refilled.

Is a pump disconnect visit billable as 96521?

Contested. The descriptor says refilling and maintenance, and practices differ on whether a disconnect-only encounter qualifies. AMA CPT Assistant addressed 96521 in June 2026 but the guidance is paywalled, so this page does not claim to settle it. What is safe: a genuine refill is 96521, and many payers expect a low-level established-patient visit for a disconnect-only encounter. Confirm against your MAC and keep the documentation.

Do these codes apply in the hospital or at home?

Professional charges for 96521 through 96523 are intended for the physician-office setting. They should not be submitted for services administered in a hospital or in the patient's home, where the billing party and mechanism differ.

How much does a port flush pay?

$26.05 nationally for CY2026, against $143.62 for a portable pump refill. The economics are worth understanding before you build a workflow around the flush: it is a low-value code that is bundled in most of the circumstances where staff actually perform the task.

Does 96523 need a modifier when it is the only service?

Not by itself. If it is genuinely the only service of the day, it stands alone and no modifier is required. Reaching for a modifier to force payment alongside another same-day service is the wrong move — the bundling is by policy, not by edit-override.

Sources

Editorial review & sourcing
Reviewed by
Erin Rose, CareCost Estimate founder
Methodology
Every billing figure is triangulated against primary sources — FDA labeling, CMS quarterly ASP files, and payer policy documents — and cited inline. See our methodology and editorial policy.
Last reviewed
May 23, 2026
Update triggers
AMA CPT manual annual revision, NCCI manual update, CPT Assistant clarification, MAC LCD change, reader-reported correction.
Independence
CareCost Estimate accepts no compensation from drug manufacturers, payers, or PBMs. Full statement on the Advertising Disclosure.
Spotted an error?
Email editorial@carecostestimate.com. Confirmed corrections normally ship within five business days and are recorded in the public change log.