Reviewed Sep 20, 2026 · maintained by Erin Rose · general reference, not legal advice
What the remit says
CO-96 — “Non-covered charge(s).”
Verbatim, X12 code lists 11/1/2025.
Why it lands on drug claims
The statute excludes from Part B drugs that "are usually self-administered by the patient" (Social Security Act §1861(s)(2)(A)); each MAC decides which drugs meet that test and publishes the list in a Billing & Coding article. A subcutaneous biologic the practice administers as a courtesy — an injectable the patient could give at home — is the classic case. Same drug, different jurisdiction, different answer.
Route decides it for some drugs. A drug the MAC lists as route-dependent is excluded when given subcutaneously and covered when given intravenously; the claim tells the contractor the route with JB (subcutaneous) or JA (intravenous). A route-dependent drug billed without the modifier, or with JB, returns CO-96 by design.
The practical consequence is that a SAD-listed drug belongs to Part D, not Part B. Because the exclusion is statutory, the patient is financially liable for it: bill the Part B line with the GY modifier (statutorily excluded) so it denies to patient responsibility, and bill the patient or route the drug through their Part D plan (pharmacy fill, brown-bag). An ABN is voluntary for a statutory exclusion, but a signed one avoids the argument later; GX marks a voluntary ABN on the line.
Same drug, different MAC: five codes the contractors disagree on
| Code | CGS | First Coast | WPS | NGS | Noridian-JE | Noridian-JF | Palmetto | Novitas |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| J0129 abatacept (Orencia) | Route (JA/JB) | Route (JA/JB) | Route (JA/JB) | Route (JA/JB) | Route (JA/JB) | Route (JA/JB) | Route (JA/JB) | Route (JA/JB) |
| J0593 lanadelumab (Takhzyro) | Excluded | Excluded | Excluded | Excluded | Excluded | Excluded | Covered | Excluded |
| J1826 interferon beta-1a (Avonex, Rebif) | Excluded | Excluded | Excluded | Excluded | Covered | Covered | Covered | Excluded |
| J3110 teriparatide (Forteo) | Excluded | Excluded | Excluded | Excluded | Excluded | Excluded | Covered | Excluded |
| Q5137 ustekinumab-auub (Wezlana) | Covered | Excluded | Route (JA/JB) | Excluded | Excluded | Excluded | Excluded | Excluded |
From each MAC's SAD exclusion article as last rebuilt on 2026-08-23. "Covered" = not on that MAC's list. Full list by state: SAD list.
The fix
- Check the drug against your MAC's current SAD list (the site's list is checked against the MAC articles weekly and rebuilt when one changes).
- Route-dependent drug given IV: add JA and resubmit as a corrected claim.
- Drug is on the list for the route given: the Part B claim is correctly denied. Route future doses through Part D (pharmacy fill, brown-bag) or the manufacturer's program.
- Bill the line with GY (statutorily excluded) so the denial carries patient responsibility; a voluntary ABN, marked GX, is optional but useful. GA is for a required ABN on a medical-necessity denial, not this case.
What to attach
- For appeals only where the drug is not on your MAC's list: the MAC's SAD article showing the drug absent
- For JA resubmissions: the administration record showing the IV route
- For patient billing: the GY-modified line on the remit showing patient responsibility
Corrected claim or appeal?
Usually neither. A route-dependent drug given IV: corrected claim with JA. A drug on your MAC's list for the route given: the denial stands, the amount is the patient's (bill with GY), and future doses go through Part D or the manufacturer program. Appeal only when the drug is not on your MAC's list.
Medicare windows (redetermination 120 days, reconsideration 180 days, ALJ 60 days) and the commercial path are on the denials hub, cited to 42 CFR Part 405 Subpart I; the edits are CMS's NCCI tables.
Frequently asked
- The same drug pays in the next state. Why CO-96 here?
- Because SAD lists are contractor-specific. A drug on one MAC's exclusion article and not another's is covered on one side of the jurisdiction line and non-covered on the other. Check the list for your state, not a national one.
- Can I appeal a CO-96 SAD denial?
- Only on the facts: the drug is not on your MAC's list, or it was given IV and the article treats that route as covered. "The patient could not self-administer" is not a ground; the test is what is usual for the drug, not this patient. When the denial stands, the amount is the patient's: the exclusion is statutory, which is why the line goes out with GY.
- Does the JB modifier cause CO-96?
- On a route-dependent drug, yes — JB states the subcutaneous route, which is the excluded one. If the drug was actually given IV, the fix is JA on a corrected claim.
Related references
Part B or Part D, decided before the visit
Coverage Check reads your MAC's SAD article for the drug and route and tells you whether the claim belongs on Part B at all — and what the patient owes either way.
Open Claim CheckSources & how this is maintained
- Computed on this page
- SAD status across all eight MAC lists for five codes the MACs disagree on (Orencia, Takhzyro, Avonex/Rebif, Forteo, Wezlana). Edits vintage Q3 2026.
- Authored
- The "usually self-administered" test, the JA/JB route rule, and why the same drug pays one state over.
- Corrections
- Send one with the remit line.